Bailli: Aerotel Ltd v Wavecrest Group Enterprises Ltd
Forum » Resources / News picks » Bailli: Aerotel Ltd v Wavecrest Group Enterprises Ltd
Started by: zoobabzoobab
Date: 28 May 2008 13:58
Number of posts: 1
rss icon RSS: New posts
Summary:
Step (c) The step two 'contribution' consists in my judgment, entirely of excluded matter. First, the election to solicit pre-pay clientele is unarguably a 'business method' (see above ยงยง49-50 above). The consequence in 'computer terms' forms no part of the invention; it is done with appropriate software. Moreover, even if it did form part of the invention, it would therefore only involve the construction of appropriate computer programs and would also be excluded from patentability.
New Post