Patently-O: Spangenberg on Apportionment, Obviousness and Anonymous Comments
Forum » Resources / News picks » Patently-O: Spangenberg on Apportionment, Obviousness and Anonymous Comments
Started by: zoobabzoobab
Date: 26 Mar 2009 14:08
Number of posts: 1
rss icon RSS: New posts
Summary:
In an affidavit he provided that was discussed at trial (Dr. Frey did not testify)—he stated "I have reviewed United States Patent Number 5,283,865 entitled "Computer-Assisted Parts Sales System" (the '865 patent) and United States Patent Number 5,367,627 entitled "Computer-Assisted Parts Sales Method (the '627 patent) along with the file history for each of these patents." While there are several points in his affidavit that are important, the most critical is the concluding paragraph in his affidavit that states, "The'627 and the '865 patent differ from the IDB2000 in that, among other things, they describe novel parts systems that were not contemplated, designed or implemented as part of the IDB2000."
New Post