<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Techdirt: Software Patent Supporter Tries To Pretend Google Harmed Without Software Patents</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-76262/techdirt:software-patent-supporter-tries-to-pretend-google-h</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Techdirt: Software Patent Supporter Tries To Pretend Google Harmed Without Software Patents&quot; - There&#039;s a somewhat bizarre and ethically questionable post up on the usually excellent Patently-O blog, hyping up the fact that Google may lose its patent on PageRank (which Google only holds a license to, since Stanford actually owns it). First off, this isn&#039;t new or particularly surprising. It&#039;s talking about the upcoming decision on the Bilski case, which we&#039;ve discussed at length. The decision could impact all software patents, and the author is merely using the Google name to get extra attention.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-76262#post-226199</guid>
				<title>Techdirt: Software Patent Supporter Tries To Pretend Google Harmed Without Software Patents</title>
				<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-76262/techdirt:software-patent-supporter-tries-to-pretend-google-h#post-226199</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>zoobab</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2946</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080722/0851291757.shtml">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080722/0851291757.shtml</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>
