<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>OutsideTheBeltWay: No Software Patents?</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-60275/outsidethebeltway:no-software-patents</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;OutsideTheBeltWay: No Software Patents?&quot; - But barring that, it actually makes much more sense to eliminate copyright protection for software and simply use the existing patent framework. Given the nature of the industry, offering life + 70 years protection for software code just isn’t reasonable.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-60275#post-165185</guid>
				<title>OutsideTheBeltWay: No Software Patents?</title>
				<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-60275/outsidethebeltway:no-software-patents#post-165185</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>zoobab</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2946</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p><a href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/no_software_patents">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/no_software_patents</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>