<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>News: Who hasn&#039;t Microsoft signed a patent deal with?</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-59853/news:who-hasn-t-microsoft-signed-a-patent-deal-with</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;News: Who hasn&#039;t Microsoft signed a patent deal with?&quot; - With Microsoft&#039;s announcement of yet another patent cross-licensing deal this week, it would seem nearly everyone has a deal with Redmond. The company has inked a lot of deals since it began its patent deal push a few years back, signing folks from Sun Microsystems to Novell to Samsung. So it&#039;s getting a lot less interesting to write up each one of these things. As the latest one crossed my desk earlier this week, I had an idea. Rather than write up a story on how another name got added to the list (Pentax), I&#039;d focus on something far more interesting--who&#039;s not on the list.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-59853#post-164132</guid>
				<title>News: Who hasn&#039;t Microsoft signed a patent deal with?</title>
				<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-59853/news:who-hasn-t-microsoft-signed-a-patent-deal-with#post-164132</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 14:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>zoobab</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2946</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p><a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13860_3-9944532-56.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20">http://www.news.com/8301-13860_3-9944532-56.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>