<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>PersonalBee: Let&#039;s Make Software Patents &quot;Defensive Only&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-58304/personalbee:let-s-make-software-patents-defensive-only</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;PersonalBee: Let&#039;s Make Software Patents &quot;Defensive Only&quot;&quot; - I asked him if he thought this was a unique perspective and he said no - he thinks many experienced software engineers are skeptical of software patents.  While they are skeptical, they understand the battle going on right now and realize the value of ever increasingly large number of patents for defensive purposes. Wouldn&#039;t it be interesting if there was a grass roots movement of experienced software engineers around software patents for defensive purposes only.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-58304#post-159383</guid>
				<title>PersonalBee: Let&#039;s Make Software Patents &quot;Defensive Only&quot;</title>
				<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-58304/personalbee:let-s-make-software-patents-defensive-only#post-159383</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>zoobab</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2946</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p><a href="http://www.personalbee.com/261/33124420">http://www.personalbee.com/261/33124420</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>