<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>EPI: Editorial</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-48117/epi:editorial</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;EPI: Editorial&quot; - Patent Offices are burdened by a back-log of cases to
be examined, the EPO being no exception. The so-called
,,Tiger Economies&quot; of the East will increasingly file patent applications, and they will not want to be without
a European Patent. At the same time, the traditional
patent scenario ,,file, obtain grant, sue competitors&quot; is being increasingly questioned. Should drugs ,,on pat-
ient&quot; be denied developing countries, particularly drugs
for HIV, treatment of Malaria and the like? Should
standardisation and interoperability be ,,blocked&quot; by
computer-related patents?</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-48117#post-128511</guid>
				<title>EPI: Editorial</title>
				<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-48117/epi:editorial#post-128511</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>zoobab</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2946</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p><a href="http://216.92.57.242/patentepi/data/epi_01_2008.pdf">http://216.92.57.242/patentepi/data/epi_01_2008.pdf</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>