<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Microsoft prefers to buy patents now</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-23273/microsoft-prefers-to-buy-patents-now</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Microsoft prefers to buy patents now&quot; - In an article published by EETimes, Marshall Phelps is mentioning that Microsoft has been busy for the last 18 months to buy patents instead of applying for them for a total amount of USD 1.4 billion. Not bad.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-23273#post-58466</guid>
				<title>Microsoft prefers to buy patents now</title>
				<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-23273/microsoft-prefers-to-buy-patents-now#post-58466</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>zoobab</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2946</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>In an article titled "CEOs neglect patent portfolios, says M'soft exec" published yesterday in EETimes, Marshall Phelps is giving more details about the Microsoft's strategy on patents:</p> <blockquote> <p>During his 28 years at Big Blue, Phelps helped build IBM's IP business which now includes more than 35,000 patents and generates more than $1 billion in annual revenue. By contrast, Microsoft, a late comer to the field, now has about 15,000 patents, <strong>files about 3,000 applications a year</strong> and generates less than $100 million in annual IP licensing revenues.</p> </blockquote> <p>And for Microsoft, only the size of the portfolio matters, not matter how it is formed:</p> <blockquote> <p>"<strong>To me it doesn't make a difference if you got your portfolio through R&amp;D or through buying it,</strong>"</p> </blockquote> <p>He is also mentioning that Microsoft's investments in Intellectual Property Ventures, which has made 30 deals:</p> <blockquote> <p>Separately, Phelps set up two years ago a small group that tries to spin out technologies Microsoft has developed but cannot immediately use. The so-called Intellectual Property Ventures group which has less than ten people has struck 30 deals so far, he said.</p> </blockquote> <p>According to the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/intellectualproperty/ipventures/default.mspx">Microsoft's page on IP Ventures</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>IP Ventures spins-out and licenses Microsoft Research technology to entrepreneurs and companies in order to foster innovation and new product development</p> </blockquote> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>