Eben Moglen: An Important Patent Law Precedent Approaches http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-195220/eben-moglen:an-important-patent-law-precedent-approaches Posts in the discussion thread "Eben Moglen: An Important Patent Law Precedent Approaches" - The SFLC and I recently filed a brief in Bilski v. Kappos, along with plenty of other lawyers, and I gave a talk about the case, and the future of patent law, this morning at Cardozo Law School. The outpouring of amicus briefs in this case, which will be heard by the Court on November 9, must be particularly noticeable to the Justices and their law clerks: a stack of dozens of third-party briefs seeking attention would have been the lunchtime talk of that inner core of the Court back when I worked there, and I'm pretty sure that hasn't changed. A high stack of amicus briefs [...] means people outside the Supreme Court think the case is important. Bilski is very important indeed. http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-195220#post-628632 Eben Moglen: An Important Patent Law Precedent Approaches http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-195220/eben-moglen:an-important-patent-law-precedent-approaches#post-628632 Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:14:54 +0000 ggiedke 32664 "The SFLC and I recently filed a brief in Bilski v. Kappos, along with plenty of other lawyers, and I gave a talk about the case, and the future of patent law, this morning at Cardozo Law School. The outpouring of amicus briefs in this case, which will be heard by the Court on November 9, must be particularly noticeable to the Justices and their law clerks: a stack of dozens of third-party briefs seeking attention would have been the lunchtime talk of that inner core of the Court back when I worked there, and I'm pretty sure that hasn't changed. A high stack of amicus briefs […] means people outside the Supreme Court think the case is important. Bilski is very important indeed."

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eben-moglen/an-important-patent-law-p_b_342962.html

]]>