<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Finnegan Lawyer Challenging &#039;Machine or Transformation&#039; Patent Test Says He&#039;s Ready</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-195215/finnegan-lawyer-challenging-machine-or-transformation-patent</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Finnegan Lawyer Challenging &#039;Machine or Transformation&#039; Patent Test Says He&#039;s Ready&quot; - If the Litigation Daily were prepping for our first Supreme Court argument--no snickering, please--in a case that&#039;s considered one of the critical business controversies of the Court&#039;s term, we would be a damn sight more nervous than J. Michael Jakes of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &amp; Dunner. On Monday, Jakes is arguing Bilski v. Kappos, a closely watched IP case that will help decide whether business methods are patentable. But last Thursday afternoon, when we called him, Jakes was at his desk, sounding decidedly unfazed about his first U.S. Supreme Court argument.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:55:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-195215#post-628627</guid>
				<title>Finnegan Lawyer Challenging &#039;Machine or Transformation&#039; Patent Test Says He&#039;s Ready</title>
				<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-195215/finnegan-lawyer-challenging-machine-or-transformation-patent#post-628627</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>ggiedke</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>32664</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p><em>"If the Litigation Daily were prepping for our first Supreme Court argument<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">no snickering, please</span>in a case that's considered one of the critical business controversies of the Court's term, we would be a damn sight more nervous than J. Michael Jakes of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &amp; Dunner. On Monday, Jakes is arguing Bilski v. Kappos, a closely watched IP case that will help decide whether business methods are patentable. But last Thursday afternoon, when we called him, Jakes was at his desk, sounding decidedly unfazed about his first U.S. Supreme Court argument."</em></p> <p>Source: <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/digestTAL.jsp?id=1202435239067">http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/digestTAL.jsp?id=1202435239067</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>
