<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>BusinessWeek: Are Patent Problems Stifling U.S. Innovation?</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-171018/businessweek:are-patent-problems-stifling-u-s-innovation</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;BusinessWeek: Are Patent Problems Stifling U.S. Innovation?&quot; - Arguments against software patents have a fundamental flaw. As any electrical engineer knows, solutions to problems implemented in software can also be realized in hardware, i.e., electronic circuits. The main reason for choosing a software solution is the ease in implementing changes, the main reason for choosing a hardware solution is speed of processing. Therefore, a time critical solution is more likely to be implemented in hardware. While a solution that requires the ability to add features easily will be implemented in software. As a result, to be intellectually consistent those people against software patents also have to be against patents for electronic circuits.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:56:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-171018#post-540922</guid>
				<title>BusinessWeek: Are Patent Problems Stifling U.S. Innovation?</title>
				<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-171018/businessweek:are-patent-problems-stifling-u-s-innovation#post-540922</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>zoobab</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2946</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p><em>"Arguments against software patents have a fundamental flaw. As any electrical engineer knows, solutions to problems implemented in software can also be realized in hardware, i.e., electronic circuits. The main reason for choosing a software solution is the ease in implementing changes, the main reason for choosing a hardware solution is speed of processing. Therefore, a time critical solution is more likely to be implemented in hardware. While a solution that requires the ability to add features easily will be implemented in software. As a result, to be intellectually consistent those people against software patents also have to be against patents for electronic circuits."</em></p> <p>Source: <a href="http://app.businessweek.com/UserComments/combo_review;jsessionid=320931FE291F4F7C1CDB75CCE9FD5AC1?action=all&amp;style=wide&amp;productId=42411&amp;productCode=spec">http://app.businessweek.com/UserComments/combo_review;jsessionid=320931FE291F4F7C1CDB75CCE9FD5AC1?action=all&amp;style=wide&amp;productId=42411&amp;productCode=spec</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>
