<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>271patent: Bilski at the BPAI - What a Mess (Part 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-163770/271patent:bilski-at-the-bpai-what-a-mess-part-1</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;271patent: Bilski at the BPAI - What a Mess (Part 1)&quot; - Claim: (Ex Parte Borenstein) A method for providing catalog information for presentation to a user of a store in an electronic commerce system, comprising the steps of... BPAI: while the storage of information in independent claim 1 could arguably be done as a mental process, the recitation of a structured relationship between multiple stores that requires “path information” inherently implies that this information must be stored on a computer or database. This “particular” computer or database is sufficient structure to meet the machine prong of the machine-or-transformation test of In re Bilski. As independent claim 15 recites a computer program product, it is not a method claim that must be analyzed under In re Bilski.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-163770#post-513227</guid>
				<title>271patent: Bilski at the BPAI - What a Mess (Part 1)</title>
				<link>http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-163770/271patent:bilski-at-the-bpai-what-a-mess-part-1#post-513227</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>zoobab</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2946</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p><em>"Claim: (Ex Parte Borenstein) A method for providing catalog information for presentation to a user of a store in an electronic commerce system, comprising the steps of… BPAI: while the storage of information in independent claim 1 could arguably be done as a mental process, the recitation of a structured relationship between multiple stores that requires “path information” inherently implies that this information must be stored on a computer or database. This “particular” computer or database is sufficient structure to meet the machine prong of the machine-or-transformation test of In re Bilski. As independent claim 15 recites a computer program product, it is not a method claim that must be analyzed under In re Bilski."</em></p> <p>Source: <a href="http://271patent.blogspot.com/2009/06/bilski-at-bpai-what-mess-part-1.html">http://271patent.blogspot.com/2009/06/bilski-at-bpai-what-mess-part-1.html</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>